01
Scope and fit
We decide where Docker & Kubernetes earns its place in your system, and where a simpler tool wins. No resume-driven architecture.
★ Docker & KubernetesTechnologies & Infrastructure8-week engagement
CONTAINERS · DOCKER + K8SContainers, only as complex as needed.
Docker for reproducible builds everywhere. Kubernetes when the scale and team genuinely call for it, and something simpler when they do not.
DockerKubernetesHelm
Cycle
8 weeks · fixed price
Stack
Docker / K8s
Output
Production code + eval suite
Handoff
Full source ownership
[THE SHORT VERSION]
Containers yes, Kubernetes maybe.
Docker is almost always worth it: reproducible builds and dev-prod parity. Kubernetes is powerful and operationally heavy. We recommend it when scale, multi-service complexity, and team maturity justify it, not by default.
When it fits
- Reproducible builds and consistent environments (Docker)
- Many services at scale with a team to operate them (Kubernetes)
- Migrating off bespoke deploy scripts
When it does not
- Small apps where a managed platform is simpler
[HOW WE BUILD IT]
How we build with Docker & Kubernetes.
02
Build on a tested foundation
We integrate Docker & Kubernetes against a foundation we trust: typed code, CI, and observability from the first commit. Boring infrastructure, modern surface.
03
Eval before launch
An eval suite proves the build behaves before it reaches a user. We measure, then ship.
04
Handoff with ownership
Your team gets the code, the tests, and a runbook. No lock-in to us or to a vendor framework.
[WHAT YOU GET]
What the engagement leaves behind.
8 wks
Problem to production
100%
Source ownership at handoff
Eval-first
Tested before it ships
0
Framework lock-in
[RELATED]
Worth a look next.
APPLIED K-FRAMEWORKBring the problem.
Bring the problem.
We’ll bring the build.
Eight weeks, fixed price, eval suite at handoff. Senior engineers, full source ownership, no framework lock-in.