01
Scope and fit
We decide where GraphQL earns its place in your system, and where a simpler tool wins. No resume-driven architecture.
★ GraphQLTechnologies & Infrastructure8-week engagement
GRAPHQL · TYPED APISGraphQL when the client shape varies.
A typed schema and exactly-what-you-asked-for responses. GraphQL shines for rich clients with diverse data needs, and we are honest about when REST is simpler.
REST/GraphQLTypeScriptNode.js
Cycle
8 weeks · fixed price
Stack
GraphQL
Output
Production code + eval suite
Handoff
Full source ownership
[THE SHORT VERSION]
Powerful for the right client, overkill for the wrong one.
GraphQL lets clients fetch exactly the fields they need from a typed schema, which is excellent for complex frontends and mobile apps with varied screens. It adds server complexity (caching, N+1, auth per field), so for simple APIs we often prefer REST.
When it fits
- Rich clients with diverse, evolving data needs
- Multiple frontends sharing one typed schema
- Mobile apps minimizing round trips and payload
When it does not
- Simple CRUD APIs where REST is less to operate
[HOW WE BUILD IT]
How we build with GraphQL.
02
Build on a tested foundation
We integrate GraphQL against a foundation we trust: typed code, CI, and observability from the first commit. Boring infrastructure, modern surface.
03
Eval before launch
An eval suite proves the build behaves before it reaches a user. We measure, then ship.
04
Handoff with ownership
Your team gets the code, the tests, and a runbook. No lock-in to us or to a vendor framework.
[WHAT YOU GET]
What the engagement leaves behind.
8 wks
Problem to production
100%
Source ownership at handoff
Eval-first
Tested before it ships
0
Framework lock-in
[RELATED]
Worth a look next.
APPLIED K-FRAMEWORKBring the problem.
Bring the problem.
We’ll bring the build.
Eight weeks, fixed price, eval suite at handoff. Senior engineers, full source ownership, no framework lock-in.